CERT® Advisory CA-1989-04 WANK Worm On SPAN Network
Original issue date: October 17, 1989
Last revised: September 17, 1997
Attached copyright statement
A complete revision history is at the end of this file.
On 16 October, the CERT received word from SPAN network control that a
worm was attacking SPAN VAX/VMS systems. This worm affects only DEC
VMS systems and is propagated via DECnet protocols, not TCP/IP protocols.
If a VMS system had other network connections, the worm was not programmed
to take advantage of those connections. The worm is very similar to last
year's HI.COM (or Father Christmas) worm.
This is NOT A PRANK. Serious security holes are left open by this worm.
The worm takes advantage of poor password management, modifies .com files,
creates a new account, and spreads to other systems via DECnet.
It is also important to understand that someone in the future could launch
this worm on any DECnet based network. Many copies of the virus have been
mailed around. Anyone running a DECnet network should be warned.
R. Kevin Oberman from Lawrence Livermore National Labs reports:
"This is a mean bug to kill and could have done a lot of damage.
Since it notifies (by mail) someone of each successful penetration
and leaves a trapdoor (the FIELD account), just killing the bug is
not adequate. You must go in an make sure all accounts have
passwords and that the passwords are not the same as the account
The CERT/CC also suggests checking every .com file on the system. The
worm appends code to .com files which will reopen a security hole everytime
the program is executed.
An analysis of the worm appears below and is provided by R. Kevin Oberman of
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Included with the analysis is a
DCL program that will block the current version of the worm. At least
two versions of this worm exist and more may be created. This program
should give you enough time to close up obvious security holes.
If you have any technical questions or have an infected system, please
call the CERT/CC:
Report on the W.COM worm.
R. Kevin Oberman
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
October 16, 1989
The following describes the action of the W.COM worm (currently based on the
examination of the first two incarnations). The replication technique causes
the code to be modified slightly which indicates the source of the attack and
All analysis was done with more haste than I care for, but I believe I have all
of the basic facts correct.
First a description of the program:
- The program assures that it is working in a directory to which the owner (itself) has full access (Read, Write,Execute, and Delete).
- The program checks to see if another copy is still running. It looks for a process with the first 5 characters of "NETW_". If such is found, it deletes
itself (the file) and stops its process.
NOTE: A quick check for infection is to look for a process name starting with
"NETW_". This may be done with a SHOW PROCESS command.
- The program then changes the default DECNET account password to a random string of at least 12 characters.
- Information on the password used to access the system is mailed to the user GEMPAK on SPAN node 6.59. Some versions may have a different address.
- The process changes its name to "NETW_" followed by a random number.
- It then checks to see if it has SYSNAM priv. If so, it defines the system
announcement message to be the banner in the program:
W O R M S A G A I N S T N U C L E A R K I L L E R S
\__ ____________ _____ ________ ____ ____ __ _____/
\ \ \ /\ / / / /\ \ | \ \ | | | | / / /
\ \ \ / \ / / / /__\ \ | |\ \ | | | |/ / /
\ \ \/ /\ \/ / / ______ \ | | \ \| | | |\ \ /
\_\ /__\ /____/ /______\ \____| |__\ | |____| |_\ \_/
\ Your System Has Been Officically WANKed /
You talk of times of peace for all, and then prepare for war.
- If it has SYSPRV, it disables mail to the SYSTEM account.
- If it has SYSPRV, it modifies the system login command procedure to APPEAR to delete all of a user's file. (It really does nothing.)
- The program then scans the accounts logical name table for command procedures and tries to modify the FIELD account to a known password with login form any source and all privs. This is a primitive virus,
but very effective IF it should get into a privileged account.
- It proceeds to attempt to access other systems by picking node numbers at random. It then used PHONE to get a list of active users on the remote system.
It proceeds to irritate them by using PHONE to ring them.
- The program then tries to access the RIGHTSLIST file and attempts to access some remote system using the users found and a list of
"standard" users included with the worm. It looks for passwords
which are the same as that of the account or are blank. It records all
- It looks for an account that has access to SYSUAF.DAT.
- If a priv. account is found, the program is copied to that account and started. If no priv account was found, it is copied to other accounts found on
the random system.
- As soon as it finishes with a system, it picks another random system and repeats (forever).
- The following program will block the worm. Extract the following code and execute it. It will use minimal resources. It create a process named
NETW_BLOCK which will prevent the worm from running.
Editors note: This fix will work only with this version of the worm.
Mutated worms will require modification of this code; however, this
program should prevent the worm from running long enough to secure
your system from the worms attacks.
$ Set Default SYS$MANAGER
$ Create BLOCK_WORM.COM
$ Set Process/Name=NETW_BLOCK
$ Wait 12:0
$ GoTo loop
$ Run/Input=SYS$MANAGER:BLOCK_WORM.COM/Error=NL:/Output=NL:/UIC=[1,4] -
Editors note: This fix might only work if the worm is running as SYSTEM.
An earlier post made by the CERT/CC suggested the following:
$ Run SYS$SYSTEM:NCP
Clear Object Task All
You must then edit the file SYS$MANAGER:STARTNET.COM, and add the line
CLEAR OBJECT TASK ALL
AFTER the line which says
SET KNOWN OBJECTS ALL
This has the side-effect of disabling users from executing any command
procedure via DECnet that the system manager has not defined in the
DECnet permanent database.
- Enable security auditing.
The following command turns on the MINIMUM
alarms. The log is very useful in detecting the effects of the virus left by
the worm. It will catch the viruses modification of the UAF.
$ Set Audit/Alarm/Enable=(ACL,Authorization,Breakin=All,Logfailure=All)
- Check for any account with NETWORK access available for blank passwords or passwords that are the same as the username. Change them!
- If you are running VMS V5.x, get a copy of SYS$UPDATE:NETCONFIG_UPDATE.COM from any V5.2 system and run it. If you are running V4.x, change the username
and password for the network object "FAL".
- If you have been infected, it will be VERY obvious. Start checking the
system for modifications to the FIELD account. Also, start scanning the system
for the virus. Any file modified will contain the following line:
It may be in LOTS of command procedures. Until all copies of the virus are
eliminated, the FIELD account may be changed again.
- Once you are sure all of the holes are plugged, you might kill off NETW_BLOCK. (And then again, maybe not.)
This document is available from:
CERT/CC Contact Information
Phone: +1 412-268-7090 (24-hour hotline)
Fax: +1 412-268-6989
CERT Coordination Center
Software Engineering Institute
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
CERT/CC personnel answer the hotline 08:00-17:00 EST(GMT-5) / EDT(GMT-4)
Monday through Friday; they are on call for emergencies during other
hours, on U.S. holidays, and on weekends.
We strongly urge you to encrypt sensitive information sent by
email. Our public PGP key is available from
If you prefer to use DES, please call the CERT hotline for more
Getting security information
CERT publications and other security information are available from
our web site
* "CERT" and "CERT Coordination Center" are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Any material furnished by Carnegie Mellon University and the
Software Engineering Institute is furnished on an "as is"
basis. Carnegie Mellon University makes no warranties of any kind,
either expressed or implied as to any matter including, but not
limited to, warranty of fitness for a particular purpose or
merchantability, exclusivity or results obtained from use of the
material. Carnegie Mellon University does not make any warranty of any
kind with respect to freedom from patent, trademark, or copyright
Conditions for use, disclaimers, and sponsorship information
Copyright 1989 Carnegie Mellon University.
September 17,1997 Attached Copyright Statement